When comparing Nanum Gothic Coding vs Google Noto, the Slant community recommends Nanum Gothic Coding for most people. In the question“What are the best programming fonts?” Nanum Gothic Coding is ranked 46th while Google Noto is ranked 92nd. The most important reason people chose Nanum Gothic Coding is:
Korean, Japanese, and English are all available in Nanum Gothic Coding.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Multilingual
Korean, Japanese, and English are all available in Nanum Gothic Coding.
Pro View more characters per line on laptop screens
Pro Optimized for a large variety of displays
Glyph design on Noto Sans is well designed and accounts for HiDPI and standard displays.
Pro Open-source
Licensed and distributed under the SIL Open Font License.
Pro Retina-ready
Looks very clean and crisp on retina displays.
Pro Simple and yet beautiful
Simple and beautiful - much like the Windows counterparts such as Calibri and Arial but it's native for Linux and for this reason it looks better than these two with anti-aliasing.
Pro Expansive character set
Noto Sans is one of the most comprehensive fonts in the market, covering an estimated 30+ languages backed by Google.
Cons
Con Line height is off
Con Font pack might be too large
Because it is so comprehensive, the TTF/OTF packages in ZIP is really large.