Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to Safari
Join our community
Top Con
•••Top Pro
•••
Top Con
•••
Top Con
•••
Top Pro
•••Top Pro
•••
Martin Ayon's Experience
Top Con
•••
Yeturu Chenchukumar's Experience
Top Con
•••Top Con
•••
starcrescendo's Experience
Since Foundation is built to be customizable, it's default style may not be very appealing for most. While it's true that most production-ready websites shouldn't be using the default style of a css framework (they would all end up looking the same), this is even more true for Foundation. See More
Foundation uses REMs instead of pixels, meaning you don't have to state an explicit height, width, padding, etc, for every device. Simply put, using REMs means you can just state font-size: 80%; and have the whole component (and its nested elements) shrink by 20%. This is great for making your site mobile friendly. There is also a Sass function in Zurb that converts pixels to REMs so if you're used to thinking in pixels, you don't have to learn a different system. See More
Attempts to use GULP to build a custom package, but contains scripts that are written in an outdated version that doesn't work with current builds. Lets you select components without their dependencies which results in bad builds, does not list component dependencies so you don't know which modules you can't leave out. See More
While the styling and components parts of Semantic UI are well-made and eye-catching, the logic and JavaScript part needs some work. Many features are bugged or behave in unexpected ways. Some aren't optimized to work with all devices. For example, the navigational menu in the Semantic UI website is often laggy when viewed through a mobile device. See More
Material design is very opinionated on how design elements should behave and look. The basics of which revolve around certain visual elements (physics, space, momentum and light) which are used to create specific UX elements. This is very helpful because it creates a consistent feel without making every design look the same. This can be seen in Materialize too, where each element may be customized but still it keeps the consistent look of the material design. See More
While the default style is not bad at all, Materialize also gives developers the ability to customize it and fit their own style, while still keeping in line with the Material Design philosophy. Along with the CSS files, designers can also download the SASS files which can be edited and compiled. See More
Large support community, extensive documentation, and code examples. See More
Bootstrap's over-reliance on HTML classes for styling can get very messy very quickly. There's also an overabundance of DOM elements which have a lot of classes and are more often than not nested inside DOM elements with even more classes. This gets problematic down the line because the maintainability of the project gets harder when the project starts to get large. See More
I'm working with bootstrap science 2017 on words. Bootstrap saved a lot of time to me. See More
Bootstrap - both 1 and 2 - uses very common class names, like "alert", "label", "btn". Those short names are great when you're hand typing out your CSS, but they are very difficult to search for in a codebase of thousands of files. Also these classes may cause collision with other frameworks or components CSS. See More
The docs include too few examples and too little details for each topic discussed. For example, it's unlikely you will be able to understand how modals work from five simplest possible use cases. What roles each of the wrappers play in the modal's HTML? What can be omitted and what must stay? What actually "hide" method does, does it remove the modal's data from DOM? And that applies to each and any of the widgets in Javascript section. See More
I love the UIKit, the framework is the best to work with, reliable, and easy to integrate with any CMS or template engine or custom app. The only problem is with the company that develops it, YooTheme, they are very slow with updates and horrible with support. They are tackling way too many projects and UiKit development suffers because of this. Still, the framework is exceptional, cleanly-coded, fast, and free. See More